No Hard Feelings Queer relationship blossoms in this tactful story of migrant identification from first-time manager Faraz Shariat.

In the darkness of his bedroom, a promise for his own sanity as a young gay German-Iranian man“ I am the future,” Parvis (Benjamin Radjaipour) mutters to himself. No Hard Feelings, Parvis confronts the direction of his future and the duplexity of his own identity against the backdrop of Germany’s refugee programme in Faraz Shariat’s debut feature.

Parvis’ nonchalant life of Grindr hookups and hazy homosexual club raves is interrupted whenever he’s caught stealing and offered community solution in the refugee shelter that is local. On their day that is first as translator, Parvis is left overrun plus in rips. Handsome Amon (Eidin Jalali) approaches, extending a tactile hand of relationship that Parvis grabs. Amon’s vivacious sis Banafshe (Banafshe Hourmazdi) completes a trio whoever relationship comes immediately, each working with their very own individual plight.

For Bana, it is her deportation purchase; for Amon, it’s their orientation that is sexual for Parvis, it is a disconnect to their cultural identification.

Shariat’s digital camera glides through neon-lit events before arriving at a halt that is stuttering Parvis bends over and empties their belly on a road part. Amon and Bana are by their part keeping the wig that is blonde their face; in this tiny city, the brother-sister duo is their lifeline. As their connection deepens therefore do feelings between Amon and Parvis. It really is Amon whom helps make the very first move, tilting on the tub to tenderly kiss Parvis. Lips move but terms are lost somewhere within confessions and claims. Their intimacy that is sweet becomes with dappled light and entangled limbs, their figures indistinguishable.

Beside cinematographer Simon Vu’s stylistically queer visuals, Shariat’s eloquent direction broaches the fact of the young life having a truthfulness that is humble. Radjaipour’s studious and defiant performance provides boundless power for this young man’s intimate viewpoint. Though Parvis’ self-assurance crumbles in conversations together with mom, asking whether there is certainly A iranian term for homosexual (there is certainly). Shouldering the extra weight of parental expectation, Parvis lives within the shadow of these sacrifice. More comfortable with the label ‘queer’ but pressing straight right right back against their Iranian history, he could be between globes.

Refreshingly, No intense emotions rejects the desire for belonging.

The figures’ systems are their house, while any semblance of outside security is really a rug under their legs. Neither Bana nor Amon includes a permanence – these are typically souls waiting for a ruling. Their concern goes without saying, however the optimism the movie emits is unabashed. “The globe is ours!” Bana screams, echoing Parvis’ earlier claim, her sound ricocheting as her closest friend and brother watch proudly on.

Liquidity and accessory into the hookup culture that is mobile. a relative research of contrasted interactional habits in the primary uses of Grindr and Tinder

• Complete Article
• Figures & information
• Sources
• Citations
• Metrics
• Reprints & Permissions

This research compares the interactional methods for the primary kinds of uses associated with mobile relationship applications Grindr and Tinder.

The analysis indicates that both in situations, a lot of users share an orientation that is similar a linguistic ideology regarding ordinary discussion being a social organization, as topic-based, as enabling people to talk about and upgrade knowledge in order to enable rapport and closeness. Nonetheless, Grindr and Tinder users just simply simply just take almost reverse stances that are conversational the business of casual hookups as intimate, one-off encounters with strangers. Even though many homosexual Grindr users need to talk to arrange fast intimate connections, they become cautious about the way in which their electronic conversations might waylay them into more individual relationships and additionally they make an effort to avoid this by developing an interactional genre made of laconic, fact-checking and incredibly brief exchanges. On the other hand, numerous heterosexual users on Tinder want to attain chat that is topically-rich. Their interactional dilemma, then, could be the accomplishment of these conversation that is topically-rich however with complete strangers. The comparison that is interaction-oriented a more in depth and slight viewpoint of this so-called ‘liquefaction’ of intimate relationships into a laid-back hookup tradition by using location-aware mobile relationship applications.

Disclosure statement

No prospective conflict of great interest ended up being reported because of the writer.

Records on factor

Christian Licoppe is just a teacher of sociology during the division of Social Science in telecom Paristech in Paris.

been trained in history and sociology of science and technology, he’s got struggled to obtain a stretch in commercial research, where he handled social technology research at Orange R&D, before you take their present scholastic place. On top of other things he has worked in the area of communication and mobility studies for many years. He has got utilized mobile geolocation and interaction data to investigate flexibility and sociability habits of mobile users. He’s got examined phenomena that are various to your proliferation of mediated interaction occasions and ‘connected presence’. He’s additionally examined extensively the uses of location conscious games and proximity-aware technologies communities that are mobile. Their current work with mobile interaction has dedicated to the introduction of techniques to record and evaluate making use of mobile interaction in ‘natural’ circumstances (such as for example flexibility and transportation settings) as well as on the research of mobile relationship applications, video-mediated communication (Skype, Periscope), and surveillance (location-based track of offenders).